view of the North pole from Space

24 hour clock

Aliens

How Flying Saucers Work:



What its like to communicate with a Grey:

Polarization

I quote Michael Topper a lot here on my blog because I believe he had a really deep understanding of the esoteric meaning behind political events going on today. He was influenced by the Ra material, and then he along with his wife went deep into meditation connected dierctly with the source and gained even clearer insights regarding polarization and levels of consciousness.

You can find some more info on Polarization in the Star Wars movies by George Lucas and also by reading some posts by Steve Pavlina's polarization articles.

It kind of comes down to this: How much do you take into account other peoples free will? If you have a worldview that most people need to be enslaved for their own good, you have bought into negative polarity. To the degree that you make yourself, your life, your actions consistent with the logical ramifications of this, is the degree in which you are polarized negatively.

There are aspects of negative polarity in both the Democratic and Republican party and in organized religions, both the so-called "right wing" and "left wing."

Positive polarization is a little "difficult" in some ways and less efficient. It involves harmonising your free will with the free wills of others. Its a libertarian position, anarchist you could say.

Anyone who has reached a high level of spiritual development tends to be polarized either to the light or the dark according to this scheme.

Getting people to polarize either one way or the other is the age old battle between good and evil.

Evil is oriented to the ego construct, which is based on seperation and scarcity. Its also oriented to autocratic, top down, centralized control systems. These two things go together due to the fact that the best way for a little isolated ego to control others is through systems of autocratic top down control.

This mindset is associated with a basic fear and distrust of the rest of creation. So it employs rigid control structures and seeks to impose them upon others.

Contrasted with this is the basic hippy mindset of "free love" and "live and let live" I mean its not just a cliche' Its a mindset based on abundance and freedom. There is something to it that is deeply affirming of the freedom of choice of other beings. I really don't care what other people smoke or who they have sex with, but I also don't care if they want to own guns, make lots of money and eat meat, or say things that hurt other peoples feelings. I put a premium on others ability to exercise free choice.

This puts me at odds with a lot of Left Wingers who, perhaps ironically,also favor autocratic systems of top down control, that would prevent people from owning guns, smoking cigarettes, and for example uttering certain words. I am talking about people who favor punishment for these things.

Most large institutions such as Governmental bodies as well as Most Corporations, favor this type of top-down centralized control. So there is really no dichotomy between left and right in this country. Its a false dichotomy to favor the Federal Government over Corporations and call yourself Left Wing.

It all comes down to desire to control others out of fear of losing control. Control of ones self, in the egoic sense.

The opposite of this is basically art/music and sex. The French call the orgasm "La petite mort" a tiny death. In creative activities there is often a flow, where one loses one self in the activity. Its related to joy. Time flies when you are having fun.

The lack of fear springs from a connectedness based not on reason but on the heart. Love is what connects the seemingly separated World. To quote St. Paul, in Corinthians:

Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, (love) is not pompous, it is not inflated,it is not rude, it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick-tempered, it does not brood over injury,it does not rejoice over wrongdoing but rejoices with the truth.
It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

What do Elites want? What is the game about?

I've never communicated, as far as I know, with extra terrestrials. I am suspicious of information channelled by psychic mediums. But I've been on a path of trying to discern what exactly is going on in the World, and its always seemed to me to be something very different than what I was taught in school or get from the mainstream media. But gleaning information from fringe sources seems to require even more discernment than watching fox news.

There seems to be a semi-secret Power structure of Global elites machinating behind the scenes to some grand nefarious end. What is that end?

As far as I can tell the so called "New World Order" is simply an intensification of the "Old World Order" on a global scale. It's therefore not new, but very old, even archaic.

Western Culture appears to be a big suicide machine, based on human domestication. There has been a moral dialectic between masters and slaves, but the fact remains that most human beings are domesticated and living in a state of alienation from nature and in thrall to elites.

There are very few pockets left of indigenous humans living in harmony with nature. The majority of human beings are domesticated farm labourers; Domesticated Humans working with domesticated plants and animals creating wealth for elites in the West.

Human domestication happened concurrently with the domestication of plants and animals starting with the institution of slavery. The first farmers were slaves, growing wheat for elites. These elites originated as members of Warrior tribes that had conquered less powerful people. Cowardly groups of people allowed themselves to enslaved rather than dying in battle. This is the reverse of the take most historical contrarians would have on the situation, because most political dissent is in the form of slave morality. But the fact remains that there can be no elites without masses of people agreeing to be their slaves.

More on Human domestication see The 10,000 year explosion

Agriculture created the caste system. Groups of Warriors and Priests were able to exist off the labors of others. This has been credited by historians with the birth of civilization. Civilization has been shaped as much by warfare as agriculture. The result of agriculture was that agricultural societies were able to win wars. Feudal societies can be seen as war machines.

This basic pattern of Agriculture has intensified through time and space, like concentric circles expanding into each other becoming larger and larger, until more and more of the planet is being farmed for the benefit of fewer and fewer elites. This is globalization. I'm skipping lots of history here, such as industrialization, and greatly generalizing because I believe the basic pattern of a domestication has remained the same and only intensified over time.


The problem with domestication, is that domestic animals are dependant and alienated from the larger ecosphere. They become weak and degenerated and out of phase with the natural ecosystem. Their populations are not regulated by predators. Human beings kill off large predators that would harm them. Ironically domesticated animals are completely dependant upon their chief predators: humans.

Higher up in the domestication pyramid you have humans, breeding out of control, for the benefit of elites who benefit from the wealth they create while keeping them in thrall.

Its the same pattern repeated over and over again through economies of scale. This system has gotten very out of balance with the biological life support system of the Earth.

So, Now the global elites are poised to thin the herd. My feelings about this are mixed. Because first of all I have a basic empathy for mankind and all my fellow creatures, but at the same time I value balance and naturanl diversity. There are regions in the world that are desertified due to overgrazing. Goats are denuding the landscape, eating up the local flora beyond its capacity to regenerate. The best thing to do, would be to shoot all the goats, to allow the land to recover. Would I want that job? No.

As far as reducing human population goes, the ethical ramifications are exponentially more dire. On a continuum,of least ethical to most ethical, murder would be the most reprehensible,through creating warfare,or other covert means such as injecting people with the AIDS virus, next down the scale would be covert sterilization (These things have all gone on and are going on right now), next on the scale would be licensing parents, controlling births, like what has been done in China. The most benign would be economic development schemes that would technically lower birth rates, because, developed countries have lower birth rates.

The later option, while being the most humane is also the most problematic for several reasons. The most obvious being that the reason advanced nations enjoy a higher standard of living is due to the fact that they siphon wealth from the third world nations which act as colonies to the west. There aren't enough resources available on the planet for all nations to enjoy a Western Standard of living.

Raising the global standard of living would require deep structural changes to the way of life enjoyed by Western elites. Its a hierarchical structure based on various types of monopolies. It all goes back to the same basic Agrarian pattern. Feudal Lords monopolized food production through centralized grain storage, that they then distributed to the populace in their thrall as they saw fit. Warrior Castes monopolized violence, a Priestly caste monopolized communication with the divine. Elites controlled the culture through various artificially created distribution bottlenecks. The lifestyle of the masses was characterized by dependency and alienation. Dependency on elites for protection and food and alienation from independent means of production and direct communication with the divine.

Human beings in a wild state are egalitarian and connect directly with nature in providing for their needs and communicate directly with the divine through their animist religion, seeing all of creation as imbued with spirit.

Not to romanticize indigenous people, there are obviously drawbacks to such a way of life, most primitive people seem to find it boring and tend to flock to cities when given the chance. Cities provide much more intense sensory stimulation, than the comparatively drab experience of subsistence life.

But once again, there must be balance. Cities are not sustainable. They provide a rich sensory experience through importing a diverse variety of foods, spices, tastes, textures, cultural artifacts, technologies etc. but all of this is imported from the surrounding countryside at a level that is outstripping its supply.

Most well educated, well intentioned, socially conscious people in America are urban. They thus enjoy the benefits of living in Western cities which import such an unsustainable amount of wealth from the rest of the world, while being blind to the underlying structure.

There are vague intuitions of problems and band aid solutions, such as recycling, buying fair trade coffee and other trinkets, supporting local organic farmers, driving hybrid cars and so forth.

People informing themselves through the internet combats elite media conglomeration. There continually seems to be talk bubbling beneath the surface of local community currencies replacing the monopoly of the federal reserve. Membership in organized religion seems to be declining in favor of personal more eclectic forms of spirituality.

These are all positive trends, that seem to fall short of the critical mass needed to break the monopolies elites have employed for thousands of years in keeping humanity in thrall.

There seem two be antagonistic trends of continued concentration of power on the one hand and individual spiritual awakening on the other. Even as power and wealth continue to concentrate its base begins to erode.

This is the reason for population reduction. The underlying base of the power structure is too big and diverse to maintain structural integrity to its limited and outdated form. The goal is to reduce the earth's population into smaller easier to control monoculture of obedient workers, who buy into and thus sustain these ancient, archaic systems of command and control.

Rather than being all powerful, Global Elites are losing and making a last ditch effort cement their power. What is the game? The game is consciousness. They in sense want us to pay attention to them and to the institutions we have co-created with them, through our creative energy. Human consciousness is the real underlying resource they wish to monopolize. Money,religious, political and Military Power, Oil and other commodities and resources are only the outward manifestation of the true energy source "they" wish to monopolize. And who, ultimately are "they?" They are negative spiritual entities, demons, fallen angels, ultimately, the devil. The Devil wishes to have a monopoly on human souls. Each of us collectively creates reality, with the creative biopsychic energy of our souls.

Michael Topper:

In the higher densities, the Name of the Game is Consciousness. This simply means that the higher densities of existence, whether positive or negative in orientation, all recognize that the business of all being and existence everywhere is always that of Consciousness... becoming more and more "Aware." Awareness is related to "density" of consciousness, so to say. The STS (Service To Self) way of achieving "density of consciousness" is to "gain weight" by assimilation of other consciousness units. This is generally promoted as "All is One" and refers to "evil" as a "rebellion" or a fault or something that will ultimately be "done away with."

STO (Service To Others), on the other hand sees "gaining weight" in a different way. It sees that an acknowledgement of the consciousness of "other self" as equal to its own consciousness, in spite of completely different manifestation of that being, is the way to "network" the consciousness so that the Whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

The difference is that the STO guys recognize consciousness as being an "integrative" activity of mutual networking and interdependence because they view all others as self, even if they are different, and therefore seek to help and assist because the other IS self in an absolute internal sense. In this way, Absolute Consciousness, or God is "glorified" by a marvelous diversity of being if you wish to put it in those terms.

The negative guys, on the other hand, play the game in terms of domination, subjugation and absorption of other consciousnesses into "One." . But, they too, understand that the rules of the game posit that in order for them to truly "absorb" into their being these other "consciousnesses," that the "other" must choose to become part of their "self-aggrandizement." An unwilling "food" is, in essence, not "nutritious" so to say. If the consciousness does not choose, it becomes a "poison" to the consciousness that seeks to "eat it." And so they must promote "Oneness" in a very particular way.

Note that both sides acknowledge "Oneness," but in very different ways.

Putting faith in institutions headed by Satan worshipping leaders who lie to us, creates a psychic link between us and the negative entities. They are then able to feed on our soul energy as a food source. That is the purpose for these revelations, that world is controlled by Drug Dealing, Gun running, Devil Worshipping Child Rapists.

These revelations are for the purpose of us disentangling. Taking our power and soul energy back and using it for the purpose of building better more life affirming realities.

Why Lions and Tigers are becoming extinct.

It is 2010 the "Year of the tiger" according to the Chinese Zodiac and tigers are dissapearing faster than ever, with fewer wild tigers now than at any time in the past. Why?
Basically because they reached the top of the food chain and it was an evolutionary dead end for them. Large apex predators are rare. We humans like to think of ourselves as outside of nature, yet we eat, shit, and reproduce just like everything else. We, are omnivores and have become the new supremely successful apex predators as well as the most successful herbivores. So its just a matter of us out competing Lions and tigers for limited resources.

Its not that humans are simply competing predators after the same large herbivores lions and tigers are after. That is true in the last remaining patches of tiger habitat where bush meat hunters directly tigers for food. It was probably true thousands of years ago when most humans were hunter gatherers. But being omnivores, humans were able to coexist alongside large predators for thousands of years. Early man may have actually created more and more lion habitat wherever he went through burning and creating grasslands.

But in modern times the situation is that we have out-competed them for space. Most of this space, this potential lion and tiger habitat has been taken up by agriculture.

Lions and Tigers are no longer Apex predators, in the ecological scheme of things. There is no longer an apex that lions or tigers can sit atop, that encompasses everything,because that apex would have to include us, and not just us but all of the biomass we have sequestered for our own use, our pastures and herds of goats, sheep and cattle, our crops of wheat, rice, and corn.

Ultimately Lions, tigers and Humans are all competing for the same thing and that is lion's share of the sun's life giving energy. They've been shut out. All energy originates from the sun, its converted to carbohydrates by plants and turned into protein by herbivores, then this more refined food source is consumed by predators.

Its more complex than that, much more complex, but that's basically it. There is a pyramid where fewer and fewer complex organisms feed on the organisms from the level below them who are simpler and more abundant.

Human beings have created a far simpler ecology through domestication of plants and animals and lions and tigers have no place in this. We definitely don't tolerate them eating us, nor our domestic herds.

Modern people, living in cities are the most sympathetic to the fate of large predators. Why would this be? Could it be because, being higher up on the energetic food chain than rural Africans and Asians, we kind of resent, these indigenous farmers, killing these big sexy predators?



After all humans living in the third world are sequestering energy from the sun to be used by us, here in the West. We in cities in America and Europe and China and Japan are the at the Apex. We are the ones Getting the Lion's share of energy.